Pages

Showing posts with label The Journal. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Journal. Show all posts

12.17.2007

NCJ - April 27, 2006 SCENES FROM A SHOOTING



April 27, 2006 SCENES FROM A SHOOTING - friends, bystanders, activists, police and the death of Cheri Moore
story and photos by HANK SIMS

Frank Jager, Humboldt County's coroner, is about the only law enforcement official speaking about the death of Cheri Lyn Moore, and even he isn't saying much. Most of the information he has released from Moore's autopsy is something anyone in the county could have guessed, pretty much: On Friday, April 14, in the early afternoon, Moore, a 48-year-old woman, was killed by multiple gunshot wounds to the upper half of her body.

For the last two weeks, people have had to piece together the rest of the story from scraps --from people who knew Moore, from witnesses to the shooting, from the intense media coverage that has followed her death and from the scant information provided by the Eureka Police Department, whose officers fired the shots that killed her.

Just before 10 a.m. that day, the EPD received a call from the county's Mental Health Department, asking them to check up on Moore. The Mental Health employee told the police that she would be hostile. Officers went to her apartment above Heuer's Florist, on the corner of Fifth and G streets in downtown Eureka. They heard loud music and yelling in the apartment, but no one would open the door. Finally, the landlord let them in, at which point Moore drew a weapon on them. They retreated. This information comes from an EPD press release issued the next day.

After the officers left the apartment, a standoff ensued. The department brought in more policemen and blocked off the streets. According to EPD records obtained by the Eureka Reporter, they determined that Moore's weapon was a flare gun. They placed an officer armed with a sniper rifle on a building across the street. Moore called the Mental Health Department, requesting medication. She also called friends.

Witnesses outside later stated that Moore threw things from her second-story window down to the sidewalk and blasted music from the apartment. She poked her head out occasionally, yelling down to the scene outside her window. The EPD incident logs, as printed in the Reporter, stated that she held the flare gun to her chest and threatened to fire.

The EPD's armed SWAT team entered the building shortly after noon. Someone made the decision that they would enter the apartment if Moore could be seen at the window without the weapon. Just after 12:30, the officer on the roof opposite reported that she was now there, at the window unarmed. The SWAT team entered the apartment -- it is believed that they broke the door in -- and found that Moore had the flare gun in hand. They opened fire.

These are the bare facts. They have not been sufficient. In the weeks since, the story has grown larger and larger, with more and more people expressing discomfort or shock over what transpired in those two and a half hours, yet very little has been added to the who, what, when, where, why and how of what happened. The Eureka Police Department has said that it is awaiting the results of an interagency investigation into the incident, conducted by law enforcement officers from around the county, before speaking on the subject. By late Tuesday, at the time the Journal went to press, the investigation had not yet concluded. On Monday, Jager seemed to say that it had been delayed.

"The only thing I can tell you at this point is that there are a lot of things that still need to be done," he said. "Toxicology, I know, will take a couple of weeks. They still need to interview some people, and they also need to interview some people again to answer some questions that were brought up by the autopsy." Jager said he could not specify what those questions were.

In the meantime, in the absence of any explanations from the authorities, people are telling their own stories about how Cheri Moore died, and what her death should mean.

On that Friday morning, Marcus Smith (left), a jack-of-all-trades with his own small business, was headed up Fifth Street, toward Arcata, for a job. He was in his van, with a co-worker. Passing G Street, he happened to turn his head. He saw a police officer carrying what looked to him like a machine gun. The cop was just outside his friend Cheri's apartment. He turned around and headed back to the scene.

He retold the story about what happened that day exactly one week later, at his house, over drinks, after he and his crew had finished their work for the day. Several people were around, including an employee and one or two of his brothers. Kids of various ages ran in and out of the house, and Smith -- a slightly wild working man of 37, wearing a white tank top -- would interrupt his tale to tousle their hair or tell them to get out of his bedroom.

Smith said he had kind of known Moore for a few years, but really got to be friends with her in the last year or so. This was after she had called him up to ask for help. A whole lot of "pukes" -- her favorite epithet for drug users -- had been staying in her apartment and stealing stuff from her. Would Smith come over and run them out? He did, partly because he had an old score to settle with one of the pukes in question. And afterwards he got to know her better. She would compare him to her son, who had committed suicide.

"We talked about her son quite often," Smith said. "She'd say to me, 'I know you're not my son, but you give me that same kind of spark.' She'd say, 'I really like you 'cause you aren't one of the pukes.'" (Moore's son is believed to have committed suicide right around the same day of the year that the standoff and the shooting took place.)

"She was just way talkative, way friendly," Smith said. "You'd meet her on the bus and she just talked away."

When Marcus arrived, he saw that the police's attention was centered on Moore's apartment, as he had feared. She had been acting a little strangely in recent days, he said -- something you expected from her once in a while. He got her on the cell phone and told her to calm down, that "there were a lot of guns" out there and that she had to put down the gun and come down the stairs. He tried to get the attention of nearby officers, he said, but they wouldn't talk to him.

After a few minutes, a plainclothes officer came up to him. "This guy rolls up and says, `You're Marcus? You're the guy that's talking to her on the cell phone? No more of that,'" Smith said. He and his coworker left the scene, headed for their job.

Smith said that as he was driving up to Arcata, he tried to make his peace with what he feared would happen. He got as far as the Samoa Boulevard off-ramp when his cell phone rang again, he said. It was a mutual friend who had also been talking with Moore, and she told Smith to get back to Eureka. Moore was asking for him. "She said that [Moore] told her, `Just have him bring me a cigarette and bring me down so I know I won't get hurt,'" Smith recalled. He flipped his van around and sped back. He called 911 and told the dispatchers what he had heard. He thought it was about 11:30 a.m. when he got back.

Once there, he said, he made contact with an officer at the scene and told him what Moore had told their mutual friend. He thought the officer was excited. "He was all for it," Smith said. He said that the officer got on the radio and called it in: "Hey, we got a man out here says he can bring her down with a pack of cigarettes." (Though the EPD has said that it could not comment on the case while the investigation was pending, the department's incident logs, as printed in the Eureka Reporter, seemed to confirm this interaction.) Smith said that he assumed it was a go, and went to grab his smokes. But by the time he got back, he said, he was told that he wouldn't be going up there after all. He stayed on the scene, though, until the shots were fired.

After the shooting, he said, a little girl at the scene was exclaiming about how the woman had been killed. He said that he lost it when that happened. His face twisted up in anger as he recounted it: "I said, `Hey, that was a human life! And what's more ... that was my friend!'"

Now he was saddened and angry and a little bit scared. He said that he knew Moore was off her medication, and that he had understood it was because she ran out, or couldn't get it refilled, and that's why, in the middle of the standoff, she had called Mental Health and asked for medication. (Jager confirmed that Moore had "eight or nine" prescriptions, including ones for Xanax, an antidepressant, and Seroquel, which is used to treat bipolar disorder or schizophrenia.) Smith said that none of this would have happened had she been taking the drugs she needed to take.

"When she was on her medication, she was all right," he said. "She was full of life. When she was on a happy trip, she'd make you laugh your ass off."

On the Tuesday after Moore was killed, a vigil for her was held outside Eureka City Hall, right before the City Council was to meet. The vigil was well attended, and drew many different types of people: people who had met Moore in her peregrinations around Eureka, people suffering from mental illness and their caregivers and political activists. Richard Salzman, who used to head District Attorney Paul Gallegos' political reelection committee before being caught writing letters to the editor under phony names, and who is actively campaigning for Gallegos in the run-up to the June election, arrived at the vigil early and thanked people for coming. For some, Gallegos' indifferent relationship with law enforcement -- he has said that he will not seek the endorsement of police associations, and they are not inclined to give it to him -- is the only hope that the investigation into Moore's shooting will be thorough and fair.

Left: Greg Allen.

As it turned out, the vigil wasn't much of a vigil. It was still daylight, and people mixed and chatted with each other. Some of them shared their stories of Moore, others told of their fear that other people with mental illnesses would be placed at risk, should a similar situation arise.

Mohammad Khan, owner of Duck's Market, out by the hospital and the doctors' offices on Harrison Street, said that Moore was in just about every other day. She always got the same thing, he said -- cappuccino and a donut. He said he had no idea that she suffered from any sort of mental illness.


"I never would have guessed that there was anything wrong with her," said Gidget Leavell, who works with Khan at Duck's and attended the vigil with Khan. "She was so polite." Leavell said she was shocked and shaken when she saw Moore's picture in the newspaper the day after the shooting, wearing her neck brace and poking her head out the window for a moment.

Khan and Leavell were upset, but others were distraught. Anita Lowry, who also suffers from mental illness, said that she had gotten to know Moore on the bus, and that she was a kind person with a big heart. She said that the thing that struck her about Moore was how friendly and kind she was to her children. Her children loved Moore, Lowry said. And now she had to try to explain how and why their friend was killed, even though she didn't have many good answers herself. She recounted a conversation with her 14-year-old son.

Right: Anita Lowry

"The first thing he said to me was, `Mom, why did they do this to her?'" Lowry said through tears. "He said, `You have an illness -- what if they do this to you?" (On Monday, Phil Crandall, director of the county's Department of Health and Human Services, declined to talk about the specifics of the Moore case, but said that he has heard many concerns similar to Lowry's from patients and their loved ones. "I think that in general we've had concerns from clients and family members about how law enforcement might respond, should they have an incident," he said.)

The vigil started breaking up as the City Council meeting began in City Hall. People filed upstairs to tell the council their thoughts about the shooting. Attorney Greg Allen, chair of the Humboldt County Green Party and a long-time advocate of civilian police review commissions -- official citizen bodies appointed by local government to receive and investigate complaints against police departments -- was one of the first to speak. Last month, a group advocating a Eureka police review commission filed the initial paperwork required to put the issue on the ballot; soon the group will begin to collect signatures in support of the initiative.

Allen told the council that the issue was coming, that Eureka voters would support it, and that it couldn't be more timely. While many people were waiting for the official investigation into the shooting to conclude, he said, very few would place any great stock in its conclusions.

"The problem is that the investigation we're seeing take place is an investigation by law enforcement," he said. "It is not rational to expect anyone to investigate themselves, their colleagues or their friends. When we have this investigation done, I'm not going to believe it, and I don't think any rational person would."

Left: People who attended the vigil for Cheri Moore later presented their concerns to the Eureka City Coucil.

On Friday the 14th, half an hour or so after the shooting, plenty of people were still hanging around the apartment building. Most of them were kept back on Fifth or Sixth streets, outside the block of G Street that police had cordoned off. Bits of the story passed between them -- a woman had been waving a gun, now she was dead. No one was too sure about the rest. Every once in a while, a Sixth Street passerby, invariably shabbily dressed, would take the turn onto G, walking past the police cars and yellow do-not-cross tape as if they did not exist. A uniformed officer stationed halfway down the block would turn and notice these errant pedestrians, run up to shoo them off, then walk back to his spot wearing his exasperation all over his face.

There was a scrum of reporters and other permitted observers planted in an alley across from Moore's apartment. From there, you could still see the smashed household articles that Moore had thrown down to the sidewalk. The windows of her apartment were festooned with cryptic signs: "12 AM," "Good ole," "New owner," "Boss," "Tax!" "Had it?" The largest sign, partially hidden by a cracked-open window, read "ZOMBIE NATION." There were stuffed animals tacked to the window, and an American flag. Moore's body still lay inside.

Near the entrance to the building, EPD Chief Dave Douglas walked back and forth, talking briefly to his officers. District Attorney Paul Gallegos arrived and spoke to someone on the ground, gesturing with his hands, evidently in an attempt to clarify a point. Eventually, two grief-stricken young women arrived and were ushered upstairs.

Right: EPD Cheif Dave Douglas and a detective stand outside the entrance of Moore's apartment, several hours after the shooting.

A voice popped up behind the reporters, speaking of weapons and techniques of entering hostile buildings. The voice turned out to belong to a young man who would only give his first name -- Chris. He was a skinny guy, but with broad shoulders and a powerful upper torso. He said that he and his fiancée live across the street from Moore, and that they'd met her three or four times. Chris also said that he had returned from Iraq last June, and that the situation before him looked more or less familiar. He and his unit had to break down doors all the time back in Hilla. You got good at it after a while. He suspected that the EPD, not having much experience in such things, simply botched it.

"We fucked up our first couple of missions," he said, almost sympathetically. "Not 'fucked up,' but... " He trailed off. The point was that you got all types on raids, he said, and some soldiers were more high-strung than others. Him, he was a Humboldt County boy, he said, and everyone who grows up in Humboldt County is half redneck and half hippie, whether they know it or not.

Chris turned back to the street. He pointed down to the corner of Fifth and G. That's where you'd station your medical team, he said. Then you'd shoot in some tear gas, let her cough for a bit and then go in.

"Drop in the gas, secure the situation, bring in the medics -- that would have been a lot better," he said. He quickly qualified this: "But I don't know what happened up there. Only they know."

He said he was saddened by the loss of life. He and his fiancée didn't know Moore that well. She was perpetually pissed off at the government, he said. He thought she was clearly using drugs -- some sort of speed, probably. (Excerpts of Moore's diaries were later printed in the Times-Standard. They seemed to show that despite her disdain for the "pukes," Moore had been a user in the past.) She was Humboldt County, too, in her own way. You meet people just like her all the time. All she needed was to get off the street drugs and back on her medication.

"I'm just sorry to see an older lady go," he said, summing up with a shake of his head. "That's all. She was an older lady waving a flare gun around, but does that mean she doesn't have a right to live? I don't know."



Why did the police wait only two and a half hours before busting down the door and confronting someone they knew to be mentally ill, someone who they knew was asking for her medication, someone who had told a friend that she would surrender peacefully if he would bring her cigarettes and escort her down? How hard did the EPD's crisis negotiators try, and what did they accomplish? Several potentially mitigating factors have worked their way into the discourse. There was said to be a bedridden person who could not be moved in a neighboring apartment, and that the discharge of a flare gun or the use of tear gas could have put that person at risk. For now, and despite their own theories and skepticism, many people are waiting to hear what the official investigation into the matter has to say.

For his part, Frank Jager, the coroner, is leaning against the idea, which he floated early on, that he should call for a coroner's inquest -- a grand jury-like proceeding, open to the public, in which a panel of citizens would hear the evidence on either side and then determine whether the shooting was justified, whether the incident was handled properly. Jager said that he believed that EPD Chief Dave Douglas, who announced his impending retirement earlier this year, should respond to the public's questions in the case, and that he should do so sooner rather than later. Many people, including some members of law enforcement who wished not to be named, have criticized Douglas for not being more active in responding to the community's concerns about the incident.

"What needs to be done in this case is that Douglas and the district attorney, or Douglas alone, needs to hold a press conference and answer all the questions that are floating around out there," Jager said.

In the meanwhile, the questions -- and the stories that have survived that day -- are still floating, and it could be that they will continue to float for a long time still.
***

NCJ - 9/21/06 Cause of death

September 21, 2006

lCause of death - Questions answered and questions raised in the Cheri Lynn Moore inqueststory by HANK SIMS illustrations by K. RUDIN

Last week's coroner's inquest into the death of Cheri Lyn Moore looked like a normal trial on the surface. It took place in a courtroom. There was a jury. The witnesses — most of them members of the Eureka Police Department, members of which shot and killed Moore following a two-hour standoff in April — were sworn to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help them God.

It looked like a trial, but it really wasn't a trial at all.

It was much more informal, for one. Jurors could write down questions on a piece of paper and pass them to the bench, and they would be read to the witnesses at the end of their testimony. There were no opening or closing arguments, the sections of a trial where lawyers attempt to make a coherent narrative out of the fragmented evidence presented. But the crucial difference was the complete absence of the adversarial system that is the cornerstone of the American justice system.

There was only one lawyer present to question witnesses — Bob Hickock, a retired prosecutor and investigator for the district attorney's offices in Mendocino and Humboldt counties. In a sense, Hickock was acting both as the prosecution and the defense. Perhaps because he had no opposing counsel telling an opposite story, Hickock was very sporadic when it came to following up key bits of testimony. He wouldn't pounce. So the inquest raised nearly as many questions as it answered.

The jury's findings in the case were limited. By statute, the jury could only rule as to Moore's cause of death — an issue that was never in contention. The jury found, as expected, that Moore had died of multiple gunshot wounds. But it was also able to pass on recommendations to law enforcement agencies: that officers receive more training in dealing with the mentally ill, and that mental health personnel be present in future crisis situations involving the mentally ill.

Several things could happen now. Though the investigation into the shooting has been complete for some time (as Jim Dawson, the head of the multi-agency team that performed it, testified) District Attorney Paul Gallegos still has the option of bringing criminal charges against the police officers involved. Also, there is the possibility that Moore's relatives may file a lawsuit against the City of Eureka. People who know him say that San Francisco attorney Dennis Cunningham is interested in leading such a suit. In 2005, Cunningham led a legal team that successfully sued the City of Eureka and Humboldt County over its use of pepper spray against non-violent timber protesters.

If the shooting ever receives a day in court, the following questions — some unanswered, some answered only partially — will be further fleshed out.

Why did the police order Moore's friend to hang up on her?

Sgt. Lynne Soderberg, the head of the Eureka Police Department's crisis negotiation team, was called into work as soon as it was clear that there would be a standoff between Cheri Moore and the police. As she was driving down, she passed the standoff itself — in downtown Eureka, on G Street between Fifth and Sixth streets. As she pulled up, an officer came up to her and told her that a man had come up to him to tell him that he had Moore on the phone. Soderberg ordered the man to hang up and not call again. It turned out that she had lost her last chance to talk to Moore — neither Soderberg nor her staff, located back at police headquarters, would establish effective communication with her again.

The man on the cell phone was Marcus Smith, a friend of Moore's. He had been driving by on his way to work when he spotted the large police contingency outside her apartment. Concerned for his friend, and knowing that she had been unstable in recent days, he pulled over to try to help her. He got her on his cell phone, talked with her a bit, then offered the phone to an officer at the scene. Soon after, Soderberg told him to hang up.

Soderberg testified that she didn't realize that Smith was offering the phone to the police — she was just following standard procedure, which seeks to limit contact between a barricaded subject and third parties. The procedure was important, she said, because if the police do not have control over communications, any number of things can happen — a friend might try to give away police locations and tactics, or may inadvertently make the person more hostile.

Why were the police so concerned about Moore's flare gun?

One of the original officers on the scene, Kevin Lawson, testified that when he and Ofcs. Mike Quigley and A.J. Bolton first poked their heads in the room and looked down the hall, he believed that the weapon Moore was pointing at them might not have been a flare gun, but a regular sidearm. He also testified that he took Moore's voice for a man's, and so reported that there may have been two people in the apartment. Lawson's reports led to some initial confusion about how to respond, though neither proved correct.

But the police department did know that Moore was in possession of a flare gun, as Quigley had seen it in when he was called to her apartment a few days earlier. Later, spotters posted across the street from the apartment could see and identify the flare gun through the windows, as Moore pointed it toward her front door, out toward the street and occasionally at herself.

Eureka Police Chief David Douglas testified that he believed the combination of Moore's erratic behavior and the unknown quantity the flare gun represented posed a serious threat to the building, and to another resident down the hall who would not or could not evacuate. As Craig Pasquini, an employee at Humboldt County's Mental Health Department, had testified, Moore had told him she was prepared to burn down the building; Douglas had received that information, he said, and he took her threat seriously.

While at the scene, Douglas said, he learned that there was a vacant space above the ceilings in the apartment; he said he feared that the building would quickly catch fire if a flare were lodged up there, out of the fire department's reach.


What was the rationale behind the "hands-free" strategy?

When the police arrived, they set up a command post in the Heuer's Florist office, which was located on a half-level in between the ground floor and the second floor. Four key people were stationed at the post: Douglas, Soderberg, Lt. Tony Zanotti (the overall commander) and Ofc. Todd Wilcox (the SWAT team commander).

During this time, several plans for ending the standoff were discussed, according to the testimony of several of these officers. There was the chance that negotiations would succeed, and Moore would be talked down. There was a plan to tackle Moore and take her into custody in the event that she opened her door. There was a plan to charge the apartment in the event the flare gun was fired. Eventually, according to Zanotti, Wilcox developed an intermediary plan — to charge the room in the event that one of the two spotters stationed across the street saw Moore at a window with her hands empty.



"This contingency plan was based on surprise — to overwhelm, and to get to her before she can rearm herself or flee into another room inside the house," testified Sgt. Michael Johnson, a member of the SWAT team that eventually broke down Moore's door and entered the room.

There was no testimony that revealed the existence of a contingency plan — what the team should do if Moore picked the gun up in the time it took for the SWAT team to bust down the door and run down the hall. This was a strange omission, considering that it would have taken only a moment to pick the gun up again, and that Moore had threatened to shoot at the police if they forced entry into her apartment.

Minutes after the spotters were given the order to radio in if she had both her hands free, one of them did. The SWAT team, as per instructions, charged the door at that moment.

Why didn't the spotter with the best view of Moore see her hands?

The police department had stationed two of its officers across the street from Moore's apartment to watch her movements and report them to everyone else at the scene. One of them, Det. Ron Harpham, was positioned on the second floor of the Vern's Furniture building directly across G Street from Moore's apartment. He had a straight view into Moore's apartment. The other, Ofc. Robert Mengel, was on the roof of the building just south of Vern's, and was looking at Moore's apartment from above and at an angle. Nevertheless, it was Mengel who gave the signal saying Moore's hands were empty, triggering the SWAT team to enact the "hands-free" strategy just moments after it had been put into place.

Mengel has since moved to Idaho and could not appear at the inquest. Instead, Jim Dawson, chief investigator for the District Attorney's office and the head of the multi-agency team that investigated the shooting, read the interview he conducted with Mengel on the afternoon of April 14. Mengel had told Dawson that he had seen Moore pull back a curtain with one hand, while she reached to open a window with another, and so sent the "hands-free" signal. (For reasons that are unclear, Mengel, at least at some point during the morning, had been watching Moore down the sights of his rifle, which he kept trained on her windows. The rifle was not equipped with a scope.)

Remarkably, though Harpham was on the stand for nearly 40 minutes, Hickock did not ask him what he had observed at the moment Mengel sent word to the SWAT team. That took a follow-up question from the jury.

"She had opened up the curtain, and she had presented about two-thirds of her body," Harpham said. "I could not see her right hand." He said that Moore was fussing with something in the window, but that he never saw her right hand free. He heard Mengel give the signal over his radio, and heard Wilcox, the SWAT commander, shout "Go" one or two seconds later. At the moment he heard "Go," he saw Moore turn in the window, raising her right hand above the ledge and into his line of sight. She was holding the flare gun.

"She either grabbed it from her waistband — I'm speculating — waistband, window ledge, desk, or maybe she had it in her hand all along," Harpham said. (Harpham's younger brother Rocky, a member of the SWAT team, testified that he saw her pick up the gun. Johnson, who was right behind Rocky Harpham, said that Moore had the gun in her hand when he first spotted her in the apartment.)

Why didn't the SWAT team use the defensive devices it had available?


One of Det. Ron Harpham's first duties at the scene of the standoff was to deliver ballistic shields to the beat officers then stationed in the hallway — Quigley, Lawson and Bolton (see sidebar). Those shields stayed put when the officers were relieved by the SWAT team. But when the team stormed Moore's apartment, the shields were left where they were.

Several of the officers testified that there were two reasons for this. First, the shields were bulky, and the team believed that they would be a hindrance. The SWAT team had surveilled a neighboring apartment, and saw that the hallway leading from the door to the front room, where Moore would be, was very narrow. It was thought that the shields would slow the team's movement down the hall, ruining the element of surprise that the "no-hands" plan depended on.

Also, SWAT members testified that they were uncertain how useful the shields would be against a flare pistol. Though the shields were designed to stop bullets, they didn't know what effect they would have against a burning flare. They said that they had no experience with marine flares being used as weapons.

Why didn't the SWAT team use less than lethal force?

One of the members of the team, Ofc. Tim Jones, carried a compressed air rifle that fired plastic pellets containing pepper spray, which are designed to burst upon impact. This less-lethal weapon, as it is known, is designed to incapacitate a person, though it is not 100 percent effective in doing so. However, Jones was only the third member of the SWAT team to go through Moore's front door and enter her front room. By the time he got there, the two officers in front of him — Rocky Harpham, who carried a shotgun, and Sgt. Michael Johnson, who carried a rifle — had already confronted Moore, and had opened fire. When he got there, Jones also opened fire with the air gun.

Why didn't Jones enter first, giving the police another non-lethal chance to incapacitate Moore? According to his Jones' testimony, it is not standard SWAT practice to have a less-lethal weapon be the first brought to bear on a potentially violent subject. The weapon might not have succeeded in immediately halting Moore, he said, leaving her to possibly fire the flare gun at the officers or at the walls of roof of the building.

Douglas was asked if the use of tear gas was considered. He said that commanders had thought that the use of tear gas would be ineffective, as Moore had several of her windows open.

How did Moore come to be shot in the back of the head?

Dr. Susan Comfort, a medical examiner from the Shasta County Coroner's Office, performed the autopsy on Moore's body, and testified at the inquest about her findings. She described as best she could each of the multiple wounds that Moore had received throughout her neck and torso from the nine shotgun and rifle shots she had taken. She received the fire in the front of her body or her profile, except in one instance — she had a single rifle wound squarely in the back of her head.


How she came to receive this wound was never explained at the inquest. Indeed, the testimony of the SWAT members who fired upon her seemed to contradict the physical evidence. None of the officers reported that Moore ever faced away from them while they shot.

Rocky Harpham — who has since moved to Texas — was the first in building, and the first to shoot. He said he opened fire when Moore had turned to nearly face him, flare gun in hand, and saw her fall backwards into a chair. Johnson said that as he remembered it, Moore was facing him and pointing the flare gun directly at him when he fired. He said she slumped forward and fell to the side. Jones said that she walked backwards as she was shot, and continued to do so until she fell back. None of the officers said that Moore had ever turned to face away from them from the moment they opened fire.

Comfort said she had no way of determining if the rifle round Moore received to the back of the head was the fatal one.
***
Sidebar:
The Cheri Moore incident


On the morning of April 14, Cheri Lyn Moore, a 49-year-old resident of the apartments above Heuer's Florist (516 G St., Eureka) made a call to the county mental health department, stating that she was despondent and required medicine. She stated that she "was not a terrorist," but that she was prepared to burn or blow up her apartment building if she didn't get what she needed. Mental health workers notified the Eureka Police Department, which sent three of its officers to perform a welfare check on Moore.

It was later learned that the day was the anniversary of her son's suicide, and that she often acted erratically at that time of year.

When the three officers arrived at the location, they noticed that loud music was blasting from the apartment in question. There were signs hung up on the windows, some of them denouncing her landlord, with whom she had been fighting. Moore's neighbors and her landlord had frequently complained to the police about her habit of playing the stereo loudly, and one of the officers had been to her apartment only days prior on such a call. On that occasion, the officer noticed an orange marine flare pistol sitting on a table.

The officers proceeded to the second floor and knocked on Moore's door. She did not let them in. Eventually, they acquired a key from the landlord and opened the door themselves. When they stuck their heads in the building, they saw Moore pointing the flare gun at them from down the hall. They retreated and called for backup.

The EPD's SWAT team responded to the location, and its crisis negotiation team was activated. The SWAT team took up positions in the hall of the apartment building, relieving the officers who had responded to the initial call. A command post was set up inside the building. Streets were cordoned off. Moore continued to blast music, and began to throw items from her apartment onto the sidewalk below. She was frequently heard to scream at the police and others in the area. She brandished the flare gun in the window.

The police department devised a tactical plan for storming the apartment. If one of the department's spotters, stationed across the street, could see that Moore did not have the flare gun in her hands, the SWAT team would rush the apartment and take her into custody. Moments after the plan was devised, one of the spotters signaled that her hands were free. The SWAT team broke down her door and rushed down a hall to where she was at. There is varying testimony about what they found — either she had the flare gun in her hands by the time they got there, or she picked it up as she saw them coming. According to the SWAT team members, Moore aimed the weapon at them. They shot her nine times with shotgun and rifle fire, killing her.

When investigators searched the apartment that afternoon, the flare gun was found on the floor, loaded and cocked.

For more information on the Cheri Moore case, see "Scenes from a Shooting," April 27, 2006.